Norton vs. Kaspersky (NIS vs. KIS)
Why Kaspersky is better in use (more user friendly) than Norton?
At least cause of:
1) it is blocks/freezes file using/activity and asks user about to delete file or not (critical as false detection or just infected self-extracted rar archives, which can be unpacked without execution, false detection on not mine USB sticks or other drives - It needed to go to the quarantine and restore, and if this file is in root folder or used path, it must be added into exclusions, and there is not just one file and there are 5 files? )
2) Kaspersky have very useful banner-blocker - flash, gif-png-jpg (images), and pop-ups or opening of new windows (norton have not, saw many such activity in supported Google Chrome web browser)
Here lists (in the first sight of kaspersky) very comfortable things that kaspersky can and norton can not.
May be such functionality/ability and posted below in further can be added into Norton to make it more comfortable, user-friendly? Why not? Why to stay as is?