Forum Feedback

[dickevans Super RootKit Eradicator]

Flo,

I am in no way advocating that the gurus limit their activity or their participation in as many forums as they desire. My suggestion was that they might be allowed to assume responsibility for making sure that the messages marked as the solution to a problem were correct. Where there was no solution marked or it was incorrectly marked they be allowed to change/mark it. I considered this to be only a minimal addition to the reasposibilities of the gurus, if the concept is approved. The other half of that is that the gurus would have to accept the responsibility - again, a voluntary addition.

Sorry if I wasn't or am not clear

[yank Trojan Terminator]

---

delphinium wrote:

It's always been my understanding that posting in multiple forums was encouraged.  Many of the issues are the same.  Connection problems are connection problems regardless of the forums.  I don't post on Ghost threads because I have never used it.  Nor do I post on the mobile apps threads.  Symantec doesn't actually insist that we know what we are talking about.  It does help if we do, however.  Just my humble opinion.

---

Once again I have to agree with delphinium, an ID Safe problem is an ID Safe problem, as a download problem is a download problem, a NTB problem (in some cases regardless of browser), is a NTB poblem, etc.

There may be different routes to get to the settings in the various products,and some differences in the operation of the programs (especially when NIS is upgraded and N360 is still working on the newer engine and niceties), but there are many similarities and being limited to one board if you know enough to make intelligent posts on more than one board is plain stupid. 

Speaking of stupid, (take me for example )  I use Norton Security Suite (Comcast) on one system and NIS 2012 on another system, but because NSS is basically N360, I feel comfortable posting on all three forums.

I stay away from Ghost, networking and the Mobile Boards as I know I am not quailfied to post anything in those areas.

IMHO, it would be silly of me to limit myself to one board, however, that also has to be a self-recognized situation.  If you don't know what you are talking about, then don't respond!  

[Shardstride]

 You make me laugh Yank; Your funny + you have style! In referance to Dick, You answered that question in one easy definition....  Sincerly,..Shardstride...

[yank Trojan Terminator]

---

Shardstride wrote:

 You make me laugh Yank; Your funny + you have style! In referance to Dick, You answered that question in one easy definition....  Sincerly,..Shardstride...

---

Thanks Shardstride - I think! 

[dickevans Super RootKit Eradicator]

---

Shardstride wrote:

 You make me laugh Yank; Your funny + you have style! In referance to Dick, You answered that question in one easy definition....  Sincerly,..Shardstride...

---

I guess that means I have to add a 'me too' I think

[Krusty13]

---

yank wrote:

---

Krusty13 wrote:

---

delphinium wrote:

Krusty13:

I certainly don't mind if you are pro or against.  It is a discussion, after all.  Everybody is entitled to an opinion.  It's just better to have your opinion attached to the question.  

---

Hi delphinium,

How can I get this thread moved to yours?

Thanks.

---

Simply click on the Report Inappropriate Content  link on the original post in your thread and on the resulting page, type in your request.  In this case I would do somethng like:

Please merge this thread with the already exsisting thread of the same subject located here:  http://community.norton.com/t5/Forum-Feedback/RE-A-Concern-or-Not/td-p/595254

---

Thanks for the info,  I will know nxt time. 

[delphinium Norton Fighter]

Hey!  Krusty13, you made it!!  We've been waiting for you.  

[Krusty13]

I didn't think I would be missed. 

....A very interesting read.

[dickevans Super RootKit Eradicator]

---

Krusty13 wrote:

I didn't think I would be missed. 

....A very interesting read.

---

I hope you were missed. Wouldn't want anybody hitting you

Please join the conversation. I don't think we're near the end yet.

[SUBASH_PRABU Symantec Employee]

" The author cannot mark his own post as solved " A Restriction like this will certainly decrease misleading Post markings Raise your hands if you agree with me...