Reply
Super Contributor
Alexander
Posts: 123
Registered: ‎07-24-2008
Accepted Solution

No scans are being logged

Hello, I have NIS 2012 + XP SP3

 

No scans are logged into history after October 1, 2012.

They seem to run but do not get logged.  Both Full and Quick scans.

 

1. Has anyone seen this before?

2. What can be done about it?

 

Thank you, Alex.

dickevans
Posts: 9,529
Registered: ‎04-08-2008

Re: No scans are being logged


Alexander wrote:

Hello, I have NIS 2012 + XP SP3

 

No scans are logged into history after October 1, 2012.

They seem to run but do not get logged.  Both Full and Quick scans.

 

1. Has anyone seen this before?

2. What can be done about it?

 

Thank you, Alex.


Hi Alex,
That does sound a bit unusual. Try this - delete your history file and see if the problem remains. Somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to remember that there is a size limit to that file and if doesn't auto delete when it gets filled.

Keep us posted

 

Dick
Win7x64 SP1 current NIS V20
Super Contributor
Alexander
Posts: 123
Registered: ‎07-24-2008

Re: No scans are being logged

Thank you for the quick reply, dickevans.

 

It did the trick.

I guess 103 pages of history was too much.

 

Regards, Alex.

 

 

dickevans
Posts: 9,529
Registered: ‎04-08-2008

Re: No scans are being logged


Alexander wrote:

Thank you for the quick reply, dickevans.

 

It did the trick.

I guess 103 pages of history was too much.

 

Regards, Alex.

 

 


Alexander,

You are most welcome. Glad that did the trick for you

I suspect that when you get to about 100 pages some of the information is getting too old to be useful :smileywink:

Stay well and surf safe

Dick
Win7x64 SP1 current NIS V20
Regular Contributor
joen
Posts: 216
Registered: ‎11-20-2009

Re: No scans are being logged

> I suspect that when you get to about 100 pages some of the information is getting too old to be useful

 

If this is true, it's a serious bug in NIS.

 

If there is a "history page limit" whereafter NIS 1) refuses to log anything anymore, and 2) does not make that clear to the user, then that's clearly a huge fail.

 

It would have  serious security implications, because the user could then miss important notes in history about infections.

 

Reminiscent of the firewall debacle, where there was an _unspecified limit_ to firewall entries.