10-04-2009 07:10 AM - edited 10-04-2009 07:19 AM
Voyager10 wrote:222.exe - [TRACKING]: Symantec Security Response Automation: Tracking #13068129
This is a AV-Killer , this kills also NIS2010 in a Virtual Machine ! After running 222.exe NIS2010 no longer operational and functional, even after rebooting .
http://www.threatexpert.com/report.aspx?md5=0dce38
fa78e20e675d6904b98d0f0b8c
29 Services stopped
Kernel Rootkit
and many other Registry modifications...
Message Edited by Voyager10 on 10-04-2009 04:05 PM
Did Norton block it or not? What about SONAR 2 result? and download insight?
10-04-2009 07:19 AM
5 New threats in this submission, though two is now being detected, but 3 remaining to be detected.
Tracking #13068533
10-04-2009 07:32 AM
Norton at this Time not detect 222.exe , i do not know if Sonar2 detect this...After starting 222.exe NIS2010 is terminated immediately and out of service in my Virtual machine.
Why this happens you can see in the ThreatExpert Log
http://www.threatexpert.com/report.aspx?md5=0dce38
Insight says Reputation unknown.
If this infection technique is widely used in future , NIS2010 has a serious problem. I hope Symantec see also that Problem, if not many users will have bad luck ...
10-04-2009 07:44 AM
Voyager10 wrote:222.exe - [TRACKING]: Symantec Security Response Automation: Tracking #13068129
This is a AV-Killer , this kills also NIS2010 in a Virtual Machine ! After running 222.exe NIS2010 no longer operational and functional, even after rebooting .
http://www.threatexpert.com/report.aspx?md5=0dce38
fa78e20e675d6904b98d0f0b8c
29 Services stopped
Kernel Rootkit
and many other Registry modifications...
Message Edited by Voyager10 on 10-04-2009 04:05 PM
So, Microsoft Security Essentials detects this, NIS 2010 gets killed by it. I guess this is what this blog post is all about.
10-04-2009 08:27 AM - edited 10-04-2009 08:49 AM
i test now this File 222.exe again and again with the fresh started virtual machine , now every time the file was detected and deleted from Sonar2. Right now I can not say why the file has failed the "first test" and was able to infect the VM.
I can this Infection no-longer reproduce , the VM and the NIS settings are unchanged .
My presumption is , Quorum may recognize this file or action and notify this to Sonar2 ?
10-04-2009 10:30 AM
10-04-2009 11:07 AM - last edited on 10-07-2009 02:59 AM by TomV
SaLaDiN wrote:some new rogue program
Tracking #13071381
I found it by this youtube video
I sent a file with the same filename yesterday, I just all it takes is to repack and rehash it and it falls under the radar again.
Tracking #13009156
We have analyzed your submission. The following is a report of our findings for each file you have submitted:
filename: Soft_71.exe
machine: Machine
result: This file is detected as Trojan Horse. http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/trojan.
Customer notes:
Fake AV installer from hXXp://pc-scanner16.com/
Unfortunately Safe Web fails here totally, the crawler has been over both pages and has found nothing suspicious.
<<Edit: Active link to Website that contains malicious files is disabled>>
10-04-2009 01:29 PM
10-07-2009 05:21 AM
We look at this Risk Publication :
http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?s=4b0
Yesterday this detected as Backdoor Trojan
http://img29.imageshack.us/i/69652290.jpg/
Today no Detection and the DLL File and Malware-URL is Reputation Green.
http://img143.imageshack.us/i/74592587.jpg/
My question is how long does it take for "Safe Web" blacklist the URL?
It would be nice if once someone responds
10-07-2009 09:59 PM
Hi Voyager,
One of the main source of malicious URLs for Norton Safe Web is the Norton Community Watch feature. Typically, the URLs received from Norton Community Watch are analyzed and rated within an hour.
In this case, the Norton Safe Web analysis system was not able to detect the malicious behavior on the pc-scanner16 site. We are investigating into why it was not detected and what we can do address this gap.
Meanwhile, the website pc-scanner16 is down now. As we are not able to confirm the malicious behavior, we have changed the Norton Safe Web rating to grey.
regards
chandra
