08-08-2010 01:17 AM
I have several Statistical Submissions that are Pending in the Security History. I've listed some of the info from one below:
Description: IPS Detection Statistical Submission
Signature ID: 23318
Local or Remote Attacker: 1
Remote Port: 49322
Local Port: 80
Protocol: 6
Signature Set Version: 201100805.004
Application Name:\DEVICE\HARDDISKVOLUME1\Program Files (x86)\INTERENT EXPLORER\IEXPLORER.EXE
Offending URL: openaccess.oldapps.com/mozilla.org//firefox./relea
There are also other statistical submissions with different stuff as well. They're all Pending.
I would appreciate any help at all.
Thanks,
Cody
Solved! Go to Solution.
08-08-2010 01:37 AM
Hi Cody:
Statistical submissions are generally items that are similar to suspected problems. Anything that Norton finds that might be malicious, or is similar to something malicious is submitted to Symantec for clarification.
Have a look in your Intrusion Prevention logs to see if there is anything similar listed there. Intrusion prevention is a more important indication of something wrong than the statistical submissions. The submissions serve more of a purpose in correcting false positives than in identifying malware.
08-08-2010 01:37 AM
I would appreciate any help at all.
Help for what ?! There is nothing to help you with . This is normal . They are currently pending , soon they will be submitted. Don't worry , find something else to worry about
08-08-2010 04:25 AM
It can take several days for them to be submitted. Only a little amount of information is sent at each submission, so as to make it unnoticable for the user, and if there are a lot of submissions waiting, it'll take time. It's not of any critical importance, so let it take time and don't worry.
08-08-2010 10:53 AM
08-08-2010 11:15 AM
Hi Cody:
Would you go to the Intrusion Prevention log, click on one of the entries to highlight it, and then click the "more details" button? Let us know what the entire entry says. We will be better able to judge whether those entries are connected to the statistical submissions, or whether they may be an indication of a threat.
08-08-2010 11:40 AM - edited 08-08-2010 11:44 AM
Hi Cody,
Just to explain a bit about IPS statistical submissions:
The Norton Intrusion Prevention System uses signatures to detect and block exploits that leverage vulnerabilities in software programs to install malware. When a new exploit is discovered a signature is created and distributed as quickly as possible in order to provide immediate protection. After this initial signature is released refinements are made to perfect a new signature that is smaller and more efficient. Because there is an increased likelihood of false positives the revised definition is first released as a test signature. When one of these test signatures is triggered it is reported back to Symantec as an IPS Detection Statistical Submission. These submissions help Symantec fine-tune the accuracy of the detections. Once testing is completed the initial signature will be replaced or updated with the improved version. While testing is in progress you are protected from the actual exploit by the originally released signature, which will trigger IPS to block, log, and alert you to any real attack. A statistical submission alone without a corresponding IPS action would indicate a false positive.
Reese Anschultz provides a couple of good explanations, which I have paraphrased here, in the following thread:
08-08-2010 02:22 PM
08-08-2010 03:07 PM
Hi delphinium,
I should not have said the risks were in Intrusion Prevention. There are eight of them located in the Full History; first attempt August 7, with the last attempt about an hour ago. Here's some info from Advanced Details:
1) Saturday, August 7, 3:00 PM
Severity: Medium
Activity: Unauthorized access blocked (Access Process Data)
Status: Blocked
Recommended Action: No action required
Actor: WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MRT.EXE
Actor PID: 964
Target: Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.6.0.32\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 2536
Action: Access Process Data
Reaction: Unauthorized access blocked
Termination Session: 3
2) Saturday, August 7, 3:00 PM
Same as above
3) Sunday, August 8, 12:00 PM
Severity: Medium
Actor: C:\WINDOWS\SYSWOW64\RUNDLL.EXE
Actor PID: 3432
Target: Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.7.0.12\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 2612
Terminal Session: 1
4) Sunday, August 8, 12:34 PM
Severity: Medium
Actor: E:\SETUP\HPZSHL40.EXE
Actor PID: 2652
Target: C:\Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.7.0.12\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 2720
Terminal Session: 1
5) Sunday, August 8, 12:34 PM
Actor: E:\SETUP\HPZSHL40.EXE
Actor PID: 2652
Target: C:\Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.7.0.12\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 2720
Terminal Session: 1
6) Sunday, August 8, 12:37PM
Actor: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSIEXEC.EXE
Actor PID: 3748
Target: C:\Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.7.0.12\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 1960
7) Sunday, August 8, 1:32 PM
Actor: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\MSIEXEC.EXE
Actor PID: 3748
Target: C:\Program Files (x86)\Norton Internet Security\Engine\17.7.0.12\ccsvchst.exe
Target PID: 1976
8) Same as 7
All have a severity of Medium.
Thanks,
Cody
08-08-2010 03:11 PM
That looks good Cody. Just as it should be.
