Replies
Re: norton file submission taking 5 days, way more than 48 hours
Posted: 30-Aug-2023 | 7:06AM · Edited: 30-Aug-2023 | 7:36AM · Permalink
Please share Submission ID:
Re: norton file submission taking 5 days, way more than 48 hours
Posted: 30-Aug-2023 | 7:23AM · Edited: 30-Aug-2023 | 7:41AM · Permalink
We'll try to call attention.
https://submit.norton.com/?type=CHECK&submission_id=500bf688-2624-46f8-9ffa-694406715795
Re: norton file submission taking 5 days, way more than 48 hours
Posted: 30-Aug-2023 | 8:33AM · Edited: 30-Aug-2023 | 8:40AM · Permalink
@ereiss
~ my understanding = Norton detection was removed from the file.
Are you still seeing that Norton detection?
Please share screenshot of that detection and download link, if available.
Please post back progress.
Re: norton file submission taking 5 days, way more than 48 hours
Posted: 30-Aug-2023 | 8:53AM · Edited: 30-Aug-2023 | 9:05AM · Permalink
What type of file?
Is download link available?
Is file signed?
Is file known to VirusTotal?
ask your customer to run Norton LiveUpdate and run Norton scan against the file.
ask your customer to run Norton File Insight against the file.
Norton detection was removed from the file.
Re: norton file submission taking 5 days, way more than 48 hours
Posted: 30-Aug-2023 | 11:13AM · Edited: 30-Aug-2023 | 11:51AM · Permalink
Maybe, Norton flag was WS.Reputation.1 = reputation score based upon "the wisdom of crowds".
WS.Reputation.1 is a detection for files that have a low reputation score based on analyzing data from Norton's community of users. Detections of this type are based on Norton’s reputation-based security technology.
The reputation-based system uses "the wisdom of crowds" (millions of end users) connected to cloud-based intelligence to compute a reputation score for an application.
WS.Reputation.1 detection is based purely on a file's reputation, which can tell you if its particular usage and distribution patterns match those frequently seen with malware. A lot of legitimate files will match this reputation profile at some point in their lives. So this detection is sort of a "better safe than sorry" block based on the premise that not enough is known about the file to declare it safe. (credit SendOfJive)
fwiw ~ In my experience WS.Reputation.1 flag usually clears as Norton gathers more telemetry.
fwiw ~ old related threads
Clarification on WS.Reputation.1 detection
https://community.norton.com/en/forums/clarification-wsreputation1-detection
FED UP WITH WS.REPUTATION.1
https://community.norton.com/en/forums/fed-wsreputation1
WS.Reputation is Crap!
https://community.norton.com/en/forums/wsreputation%C2%A0-crap
@ereiss
Maybe, ask your customer if Norton detection was WS.Reputation.1?
This thread is closed from further comment. Please visit the forum to start a new thread.