Not what you are looking for? Ask the experts!
Why does anti-spam require a "name" with an email address?
First, marking an email as SPAM in Norton AntiSpam should add that email address to the "blocked" list. It doesn't. Second, I should be able to add an email address without a name to the "blocked" list. Why? Because certain political spammers change the "name" on the email to be a short headline with each spam mailing, but the email address is the same. But checking BOTH is a stupid approach - it should key on the email address alone for this exact reason. Or am I missing something? Right now, AntiSpam is useless for me in Outlook because of this (and Outlook appears to have the same non-logic involved in their "junk" blocker.) Someone straighten me out please!