JoeZ wrote:
I had a weird computer problem- my Vista windows Mail program had trouble sending out email- sometimes it would go and often it wouldn't, then I could try again and it would. I had no idea what the problem was. So, I went to 2 local computer repair shops. Both asked what my AV program is and when I said Norton, they both looked ill - both said Norton is a terrible program.
at least the second tech I spoke to recommended seeing if changing the outgoing server port number might work- so I called my provider, Time-Warner- the TW tech gave me a new port number, and voila, it worked! Why the old number stopped working, I don't know- but, luckily it wasn't a virus/malware problem
I've now been using Norton for several years. I like it. So far, no infestation of maleware- it's easy to use, it has lots of features--- but I'd like to know why so many computer techs diss the program?
Joe
Hi
First, file Hugh's post in the
Excellent post :)
I've run into the same feedback with Norton among some store associates. In my opinion. most of the negativity is due to past perceptions about Norton as Hugh mentioned. I remember a few years ago when I was shopping around for my 2nd AV product, I wrote off Norton for this reason. Norton's rep was mostly influenced by the "system hog" point of view, using excessive processor / memory resources on one's PC.
I'm one year into running Norton on my 2 PC's at home. Since it's only been a year (I like to evaluate an AV after 2+ years to track intrusions that get past an AV's frontline protection), I'd grade Norton a solid "A". I'm fairly certain that next year at this time, it'll be an "A+" .
Norton is my 3rd AV product in the last 10 years, the time that I began 'net use at home on my PC's. During that time, my previous 2 AV's, both fairly well-known name products, failed at times to fully block atl effecs of intrusions into my PC.
To be fair, they both did inform me with Sys Tray popup's at the time that the intrusions were detected and according to their logs, they quarantined the object but weren't able to completely deter all effects... the usual things, all Desktop icons unusuable, IE locked to one site, "scam" dialogs trying to tell me that my PC needs help with $$'s, etc.
My take on rating AV's is:
1) Word of mouth, friend's experiances are valuable.
I have several friends that have been using Norton for years with good results.
2) Testing an actual online threat at a site where it's known the site was infected.
I got to see Norton's
when I went to that site and Norton blocked the threat. I knew about the threat since my friend had visited the site at the same time while were were talking on the phone. He's running NIS and I have Norton 360. We're both running Windows 7 x64.
The site mentioned is reputable and is on my daily 'net visit list, just to be clear :). It wasn't one of those questionable / suspicious-looking sites.
I also tested my previous AV tool, one whose major selling point is it's reputation for streamlined PC resource usage. This AV failed to block one of those "FBI" attacks, complete with the official-sounding "FBI" voice coming out of my speakers, and locking out my IE, etc.
.
This test was perhaps the most impresive to me since when this happened, the situaion was identical to the one I mentioned previously. I was on the phone with my friend and he was at the same site and his NIS tool sucessfully blocked that "FBI" intrusion.
My PC's previous AV fumbled the ball and allowed that attack into my PC. I laughed into the phone and my friend said "Wow, aren't you in for some headaches recovering/repairing your PC?"
I said "No problem. I'll plug in my spare cloned HDD." I was back up and running within a few minutes. That's my best advice for readers here; have an image and/or cloned spare HDD available for any infection scenario. You'll be glad you did, believe me.
So far, I'm sailing along with 360
It appears that those bad-guy objects are scared of Nortton 
Have a good day, all... I know I will
:)