Mine had 42.106987. I'm usually between 115 and 105 MH/s running a 3090. It would be interesting to test the block reward theory based on amounts and avg. MH/s for a specific window of time. Since this is pooled are the distributions correlated with the MH/s for everyone within the pool? Additionally, it is unlikely we'll get any resolution from Norton on this as it's still a "beta" and their TOS is written such that they assume ZERO liability AND we have no recourse on any potential losses. A couple of interesting statements from the Norton crypto supplement document (attached).
"If the part your computer has completed is verified and therefore accepted, you are credited with what is commonly known in crypto-mining terms as a “share.” The shares have no value themselves; instead, they are used solely as a unit of measurement to calculate potential payouts of Ether. Again, these “shares” do not indicate that you own any type of equity or other rights in any real or virtual entity."
So are we really just being distributed "shares?"
Next, "Rewards of crypto earned by the program, if any, are allocated to you based on the timing of your participation, the number of units you are credited through your contributions, and how much Ether is generated based on those units."
Looks like the lot of us were part of the timing of a large block reward, subsequently credited using Norton's systems, and then when Norton noticed the potential for huge payouts either 1) didn't have the assets to "payout" that reward 2) scrambled to collect as much as possible from the pool under the auspices of a "glitch," 3) shutdown any ability to withdraw (hence why none of our wallets were accessible) until they could move/pool the rewards into their own cold wallet. As a public company (Traded as NLOK on the NASDAQ) they will most certainly have to disclose their assets. However, I pulled their most recent 10-Q and there is no mention of Norton Crypto as a talking point. While they are not required to line-item list their assets on their filings, it would be interesting to see how they would classify such a windfall if indeed this was a block reward and not a glitch. Here's a link to their most recent 10-Q: https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/849399/000084939921000022/nlok-20211001.htm
This is most annoying part and I'm not sure how it would hold up to legal scrutiny, but being an unregulated market here in the US it is unlikely to get an positive support. " We do not know how much Ether, if any, will be produced or distributed by the program, and both will fluctuate over time depending on the results of the program. You may receive only small amounts of crypto or no crypto at all; We do not guarantee that any participant will receive any crypto at all or any particular amount of crypto." That being said, if it was stolen....might be a different story. Anyone know a good class action attorney?
I'll also mention, after the "glitch." I tried mining for the better part of the next and my ETH balance has not changed. So, payouts are NOT happening periodically despite my 3090 running for 20 hours at around 105 MH/s.