It seems that Norton has two optimizers available depending on the tools you have. In NIS, if I understand correctly the optimizer fires of windows defragmenter (applies to whole drive for Win 7 and just boot drive for Win XP). But in Norton Utilities disks are optimized with speed disk. Apparently these two work differently. So the question is--should both be used, or just one be used?
It seems that Norton has two optimizers available depending on the tools you have. In NIS, if I understand correctly the optimizer fires of windows defragmenter (applies to whole drive for Win 7 and just boot drive for Win XP). But in Norton Utilities disks are optimized with speed disk. Apparently these two work differently. So the question is--should both be used, or just one be used?
I have NU 15, which I uses Speed disk to defrag, while the most recent version of NIS I believe uses windows defrag. So would you suggest I just use NU 15 defrag?