Norton Antispam does not detect spam emails

Your asFilter.dll and ccL80U.dll are from an older version, as indicated by the installation path. Can you download the 16.5 version from http://www.norton.com/nis09 and install it? I don’t know if this will fix your problem or not but we should be working with the lastest version as a starting point (note that you might get 16.7 via LiveUpdate and we should stick with that if you do.)

Hi Reese,

 

Ok so I have uninstalled NIS2009 yet again and installed version 16.5. After 25 hours retraining the antispam engine (why does it take so long????) I am in exactly the same position - no spam is identified at all!

 

Any ideas?

 

Philip

Now we’re back to the previous question, what versions of the files are on the system. If you are still ending up with the mismatches, that’s probably the root of the problem and will have to be researched.

Here are the new versions of the files as requested:

 

asFilter.dll     

location C:\Program Files\Norton Internet Security\Engine\16.5.0.135

version 4.5.0.44

 

WS2_32.dll

Location    C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386 and  C:\WINDOWS\system32

Version     5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-0852)

 

ccL80U.dll

Location    C:\Program Files\Norton Internet Security\Engine\16.5.0.135

Version 108.1.0.24

 

And C:\Program Files\NortonInstaller\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\NIS\562C4DD5\16.5.0.135

Version     108.1.0.24

 

SHLWAPI.dll

Location    C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386 and C:\WINDOWS\system32

Version           6.00.2900.5512 (xpsp.080413-2105)

 

ADVAPI32.dll

Location C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386

Version 5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2113)

 

and C:\WINDOWS\system32

Version     5.1.2600.5755 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090206-1234)

 

and C:\WINDOWS\system32\dllcache

Version     5.1.2600.5755 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090206-1234)

 

MSVCR80.dll

Location – many! Including C:\WINDOWS\system32  version 8.00.50727.42

and C:\Program Files\NortonInstaller\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\NIS\562C4DD5\16.2.0.7\Microsoft.VC80.CRT version 8.00.50727.762

and C:\Program Files\NortonInstaller\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\AddOns\NortonSafeWeb\3.2.0.8\Microsoft.VC80.CRT version 8.00.50727.762

and C:\NSS version 8.00.50727.762

  

MSVCP80.dll

Location    many! Including C:\Program Files\Norton Internet Security\Engine\16.5.0.135\Microsoft.VC80.CRT version 8.00.50727.762

And C:\Program Files\NortonInstaller\{0C55C096-0F1D-4F28-AAA2-85EF591126E7}\NIS\562C4DD5\16.5.0.135\Microsoft.VC80.CRT version 8.00.50727.762

And C:\WINDOWS\system32 version 8.00.50727.42

And C:\NSS version 8.00.50727.762

 

USER32.dll

Location    C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386 Version  5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2105)

And C:\WINDOWS\system32 version 5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2105)

 

KERNEL32.dll

Location    C:\WINDOWS\ServicePackFiles\i386 version 5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2111)

And   C:\WINDOWS\system32\dllcache version 5.1.2600.5781 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090321-1317)

And C:\WINDOWS\system32 version 5.1.2600.5781 (xpsp_sp3_gdr.090321-1317)

 

Many thanks

 

Philip

Now the file version numbers seem correct.

 

Try to disable the product's tamper protection, make a copy of asfilter.dll and then delete the original. You shouldn't be able to delete it. If it does delete it, please restore for the copy and report the results.

Hi Reese,

 

I cannot copy the file - I get a message that access is denied - make sure th edisk is not full or the file is not in use!

 

Philip

That is mysterious. As James indicated, it looks like everything is working but it’s obviously not filtering. The usually occurs if non-standard ports are used or the mail is transferred over an encrypted/SSL connection.

Nope - everything is standard - incoming port 110, outgoing 25 and no SSL

 

Just no filtering!

 

Philip

I'm stiIl trying to isolate where the problem might be.

 

Can you send and receive mail and while the send and receive is processing run 'netstat –b' from a command prompt and post the results.  You should see ccSvcHst connected to the local machine via the loop back and outlook also connected to the local machine via loop back then ccSvcHst connected to the mail server.

This is what it looks like on a test machine:

 C:\Documents and Settings\User 1>netstat -b

Active Connections

  Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State           PID
  TCP    XPPSP3VM:1097          localhost:3321         ESTABLISHED     2900  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    XPPSP3VM:3321          localhost:1097         ESTABLISHED     1940 [msimn.exe]

  TCP    XPPSP3VM:3319          192.168.12.128: smtp    ESTABLISHED     2900  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    XPPSP3VM:3322          192.168.12.128: pop3    ESTABLISHED     2900 [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    XPPSP3VM:1097          localhost:3318         TIME_WAIT       0

 

Message Edited by reese_anschultz on 08-31-2009 02:04 PM

here atere the netstat -b results:

 


Active Connections

  Proto  Local Address          Foreign Address        State           PID
  TCP    philiplh:2874          192.168.1.11:http      SYN_SENT        992
  [HPTLBXFX.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2875          192.168.1.11:http      SYN_SENT        992
  [HPTLBXFX.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2876          192.168.1.11:http      SYN_SENT        992
  [HPTLBXFX.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2877          192.168.1.11:http      SYN_SENT        992
  [HPTLBXFX.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:1030          philiplh:1031          ESTABLISHED     1776
  [KService.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:1031          philiplh:1030          ESTABLISHED     1776
  [KService.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:1032          philiplh:1033          ESTABLISHED     1776
  [KService.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:1033          philiplh:1032          ESTABLISHED     1776
  [KService.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2176          philiplh:2878          ESTABLISHED     3344
  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2176          philiplh:2880          ESTABLISHED     3344
  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2187          philiplh:27015         ESTABLISHED     4556
  [iTunesHelper.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2207          philiplh:2209          ESTABLISHED     4108
  [msnmsgr.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2209          philiplh:2207          ESTABLISHED     4108
  [msnmsgr.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2878          philiplh:2176          ESTABLISHED     5632
  [OUTLOOK.EXE]

  TCP    philiplh:2880          philiplh:2176          ESTABLISHED     5632
  [OUTLOOK.EXE]

  TCP    philiplh:27015         philiplh:2187          ESTABLISHED     1196
  [AppleMobileDeviceService.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:microsoft-ds  192.168.1.10:1279      ESTABLISHED     4
  [System]

  TCP    philiplh:1026          philiplh:2161          ESTABLISHED     1156
  [PBESER~1.EXE]

  TCP    philiplh:2161          philiplh:1026          ESTABLISHED     1144
  [pbeagent.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2203          by2msg3010505.phx.gbl:1863  ESTABLISHED     4108
  [msnmsgr.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2879          toaster-vh.clara.net:pop3  ESTABLISHED     3344
  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2881          nginx-vdtc01.mx.aol.com:pop3  ESTABLISHED     3344
  [ccSvcHst.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:3388          a213-253-9-11.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com:http  ESTABLISHED     144
  [jusched.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:5152          philiplh:2635          CLOSE_WAIT      1252
  [jqs.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2188          a92-123-0-56.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com:http  CLOSE_WAIT      804
  [LWS.exe]

  TCP    philiplh:2331          a213-253-9-9.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com:http  CLOSE_WAIT      1100
  [dpupdchk.exe]

no replies in over 2 weeks - anybody still awake?

I know Reese has been away for a period but he's just back now so let's see if he picks this up soon.

 

Have you considered trying NIS 2010 which handles spam in a totally different way having adopted the methods used in the Enterprise version?

 

I was concerned to find that installing it lost all my learned lists since I used the upgrade on top of the previous generation which used to preserve them but it does not depend so much on being taught but works, I gather, rather like Norton Insight and Community watch with the so called "Cloud" techniques.

 

I find that I'm not doing as much reclassifying as I used to and while you cannot add an existing list to the Excluded group it does learn when you do use the This is Spam button.

 

I think my ISP may have tightened up their filtering since I'm getting much less spam anyway.


You can download the complete 2010 Installation file file if you want to try it.

 

New NIS 2010:  Click on this link NIS 2010

Message Edited by huwyngr on 09-15-2009 04:39 PM

Is this the full release version or a beta?

 

Can I just install this over NIS2009 on my current license?

 

If so it is worth a try if it might solve the problem!

 

Many thanks

]

Philip


plhermette wrote:

Is this the full release version or a beta?

 

Can I just install this over NIS2009 on my current license?

 

If so it is worth a try if it might solve the problem!

 

Many thanks

]

Philip


 

Yes this is the full release that you can get from the Norton Update Center and will be in the stores sometime soon I imagine.

 

If you go to the Norton Update Center and tell it what you have installed it will check and then use a Download Manager to install on top of your NIS 2009 and while I understand that it saves Parental Controls and the Password center stuff I can't vouch for this since I don't use them so back up whatever you can.

 

The update works fine for many but some of us, including me have had some unusual events like the OneCLick center popping up with an error that it can't fix. Because of this I did a very clean uninstall and then installed the complete package.

 

Also note that some of us are getting some odd behavior of Outlook Express -- coming up with the OffLine flag set and not downloading mail when starting up.

 

Hopefully all of these will get cleared up.

 

But since you can always reinstall NIS 2009 ......

Thanks for that.

 

:Looks like I may be substituting one dysfunctional programme for another with different dysfunctions but what the heck...... I'll give it a go!

 

Philip

"Nobody's perfect" <g>

 

I just thought I'd warn you -- note that there's been a post from Symantec Staff in another thread about antispam in 2010 indicating that when a spam message comes through but not flagged/sorted as spam when you use the This is spam button you must also use Send this to Norton for it to be examined and added to the spam base if it is to be subsequently dealt with automatically.

 

Someone was asking why having used the This is spam button messages from the same source kept coming through not as spam.

 

You may want to do a search on [ antispam 2010 ] and read up to get used to the new system.

Oh I see - so flagging something as spam  by pressing the "this is spam" button does not actually designate it as spam unless it is sent to Big Brother (symantec) and he agrees and adds it to the central database! - What is the point of the "this is spam" button then?

 

On a happier note, I have upgraded to NIS2010 and at least Norton now recognises some email as spam and sends it to the appropriate folder HOORAY! and after only 10 months!

 

Philip

Did it recognize the spam on its own or did you have to previously let it know it was spam?  That seems to be the case for me with 2010.  I have to hit the “This is spam” button before it is subsequently sent to the spam folder.  Won’t recognize anything as spam otherwise.  Also, anything that was marked as Norton AntiSpam from my old NIS2009 now goes to the Junk E-mail folder in Outlook 2007 with the marking as (Norton Antispam) plus description  in the Subject column.

That was my problem with NIS2008 andn NIS2009 - no emails were recognised as spam. Installing 2010 appears to have corrected this - emails are now annotated with [Norton Antispam] and sent to the antispam folder - (although some are also annotated and sent to the junk folder as well - but who cares!). No-one appears to know why this did not work in 2008/9 but I hope it is not going to cause trouble in 2010 as well!

 

All the best

 

Philip

Take your pick -- I'm just trying to help you understand how the system apparently works. What happens if you do not send it to Symantec I don't know.

 

Since I never ever had the experience you describe as having encountered with 2009 and before I've no idea how your system differs from mine.