Hi,
I have downloaded and tried both for a few days, obviously not together,
first i tried Norton Internet Security 2009 and must say norton has moved on. It installed, uninstalled without a hitch i was in shock over that the performance it actually does not hog system resources anymore.
Anyway overall i liked it.
I then tried Norton 360, i find the interace rather old compred to NIS 2009, and also find it lacks configuration that NIC 2009 .
I wanted to know apart from tune up tools and backup which i dont need does Norton 360 have any extra security features than NIC 2009?
Am i also rite in thinking Norton 360 version 3 is not as configurable thant NIC 2009?
I am thinking for configurability and nicer design NIC 2009 as i said tune up and backup is not important or needed.
I basically want to know what you think is best. I am just not sure am i rite in thinking norton 360 is more for the simple user who wants a total silent product that does not have many configuration settings as NIC 2009 has more configurable settings.
Thanks for advice,
Definately going to buy not sure which one thou.