Norton PC Checkup reports slow computer speed, 3 problems detected

I have an Intel i7, 3.4GHz HP Phoenix desktop with an SSD Drive C:.  The computer is about one month old and goes like the wind, yet Norton PC Checkup tells me it is running slowly, with three problems detected, but it doesn't tell me what they are or how to correct them - apart from suggesting I spend another £40 on top of Norton 360's original £40.

Norton 360's Reputation Scan tells me I have about 150MB of Known Bad Files.  Again no idea of how to remove them.

What to do please?

I have an Intel i7, 3.4GHz HP Phoenix desktop with an SSD Drive C:.  The computer is about one month old and goes like the wind, yet Norton PC Checkup tells me it is running slowly, with three problems detected, but it doesn't tell me what they are or how to correct them - apart from suggesting I spend another £40 on top of Norton 360's original £40.

Norton 360's Reputation Scan tells me I have about 150MB of Known Bad Files.  Again no idea of how to remove them.

What to do please?

Many thanks; now I can sleep nights. 

 

But ...

I've a notion that Norton is naughty

In fishing for further pounds (forty) !


GeoffOakshott wrote:

 

[...]

 

But ...

I've a notion that Norton is naughty

In fishing for further pounds (forty) !


Very poetic and I'm inclined to agree with you - see here for details. :smileywink:

 

To see the detailed results for the problems 'detected' on your machine, please run Norton PC Checkup again (assuming version 3) and click on the 'View Detailed Results' link in the bottom right-hand section of the Results panel, shown below:

 

PC Checkup Performance Alert.png

 

Please post a screenshot of your Norton PC Checkup 'Detailed Scan Results' in your next reply (see here for details on how to post a screenshot if you are unsure on how to do this).

 

Thanks

 

Status of PC

 

Thanks for your interest.  Here are two shots.

Scan PC

 

Geoff

 

 

 

Hi Bot Obliterator,

 

Apologies: you asked for Detailed Scan Results, but I didn't go far enough.  So here they are now:

 

Norton Detailed Scan 01.jpgNorton Detailed Scan 02.jpg

Could Norton be reporting a speed problem because it is only seeing the space left on my (nominal) 64GB SSD Drive C: and somehow not noticing more than 1TB free space on Drive E:?Norton Hard Disk Drives.jpg

It only looks at the system drive. And your low system drive space could be a potential issue, but if you're not experiencing any slowdowns, just ignore the PC Checkup slowness warnings. It's guesstimating and is obviously wrong if the computer isn't slow.

As well as mis-guesstimating that my computer is "running very slow" Norton is emphasising its desire to get me to spend a further GBP40 for "expert help" on the additional grounds that Windows Firewall is Disabled, apparently failing to notice that my Norton 360 Exclusive Gold Edition (which has already netted them GBP40) has its firewall enabled.

 

Norton Firewall.jpg

 

Educated opinion on this forum indicates that running two firewalls simultaneously would be a serious mistake.  So why is Norton itself implying that we should do it?

 

What are they playing at?  Do they really want us all to scurry off to Bitdefender, Avast or AVG?

Have you disabled your Windows Firewall Service? Because that should be enabled even when the Norton firewall is running.

Oh dear, now I am even more confused!  Yes, following previous advice I have indeed disabled Windows firewall in favour of Norton's.

 

Please don't be offended if I wait for confirmation here of your suggestion to run two firewalls simultaneously before acting on it.

 

Geoff

I am not offended, but I am not sure you understand. There is a difference here. Windows Firewall should be disabled. Norton usually handles this and disables it on its own. The Windows Firewall Service should not be disabled. It does more than just filter traffic, and even if a third-party firewall is installed, the Windows Firewall Service should be kept running.

Could you please explain to the uninitiated how exactly to enable Windows Firewall Service and at the same time ensure Windows Firewall is disabled?

 

Have to admit that I thought they were one and the same thing!

 

Regards,

 

Geoff

Start button -> type services.msc in the search box and press Enter. Scroll down to Windows Firewall. This is the Windows Firewall Service. It should be enabled, so make sure it is set to Automatic as Startup Type and that its Status is "Started".

 

To disable/enable the Windows Firewall itself, follow these instructions:

 

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Turn-Windows-Firewall-on-or-off

 

This should be disabled. Note that Norton usually handles this on its own.

 

Very many thanks for your clear instructions.  I was surprised to find everything already set up exactly as you had recommended, especially after Norton pointed out (as one of the failings of my system) that Windows Firewall was turned off.

 

The Microsoft video also made it clear that Windows Firewall should be turned off if you were using another firewall.  People should be made aware of this; I have been in this game for 30+ years and had never heard it mentioned before.

 

Thanks again for spending your time on this.

 

Best regards,

 

Geoff

Hi GeoffOakshott,

 

Just to clarify, whenever a third-party firewall is installed, the Windows Firewall will be disabled.  However, the Windows Firewall Service needs to remain enabled because it is essential to other Windows security features, as the following caveat from Microsoft explains:

 

Do not disable Windows Firewall by stopping the service. Instead, use one of the preceding procedures (or an equivalent Group Policy setting) to turn the firewall off. If you turn off the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security service, you lose other benefits provided by the service, such as the ability to use Internet Protocol security (IPsec) connection security rules, Windows Service Hardening, and network protection from attacks that employ network fingerprinting. For more information about Windows Service Hardening, see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104976. Non-Microsoft firewall software that is compatible with Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 can programmatically disable only the parts of Windows Firewall with Advanced Security that need to be disabled for compatibility. You should not disable the firewall yourself for this purpose. Stopping the service associated with Windows Firewall with Advanced Security is not supported by Microsoft.

 

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc766337%28v=ws.10%29.aspx


GeoffOakshott wrote:

 

As well as mis-guesstimating that my computer is "running very slow" Norton is emphasising its desire to get me to spend a further GBP40 for "expert help" on the additional grounds that Windows Firewall is Disabled, apparently failing to notice that my Norton 360 Exclusive Gold Edition (which has already netted them GBP40) has its firewall enabled.

 

Norton Firewall.jpg

 

Educated opinion on this forum indicates that running two firewalls simultaneously would be a serious mistake.  So why is Norton itself implying that we should do it?

 

What are they playing at?  Do they really want us all to scurry off to Bitdefender, Avast or AVG?


Hi GeoffOakshott

 

Norton PC Checkup's assertion that you need to spend an additional GBP40 to fix your 'running very slow' issue isn't Firewall related; the lack of free disk space on your machine is the culprit, as noted in your screenshot here.

 

The 'Windows Firewall being disabled' issue is present but not considered a hindrance in the 'No Problems Found!' PC Checkup scan results shown below:

 

Norton PC Checkup 3 - Step 3 -No Problems Found.png

 

 

 

Norton PC Checkup 3 - Step 3 -Detailed Scan results.png

 

The bottom line here is that you shouldn't be directed to a spend an additional GBP40 on 'expert help' to resolve an issue that can be easily resolved by Windows itself.

 

To 'Generate a system health report' in 60 seconds under Windows Vista and above, click the Windows Start orb and type:

 

perfmon /report

 

...in the Search box and press Enter.

 

(The long way: Control Panel\All Control Panel Items\Performance Information and Tools\Advanced Tools\Generate a system health report)

 

When the User Account Control dialog appears, type in your Administrator password to allow the program to run.

 

A low disk space outcome in the Windows System Health report typically looks like this:

 

Perfmon - System Health - Low disk space.PNG

 

The instructions provided above in the Windows System Health report are more than enough to enable a user to resolve their lack of disk space issues without having to spend an additional GBP40 on 'expert help'.

 

Given the above, Symantec should undertake an urgent review of the Norton PC Checkup software's behaviour to ensure that it is accurately assessing a PC's Health Status. Failing to do so will inevitably result in the Norton PC Checkup software being categorised by users as Scareware...

 

 

Hi Bot Obliterator,

 

Many thanks for that.  Very reassuring - although, strangely, perfmon /report said "The Security Center has not recorded an anti-virus product." despite Norton 360 being there.

 

Best regards,

 

Geoff

Hi GeoffOakshott

 

Don't worry about that message - I see it too. As long as the Windows Action Center reports that your Security is OK, then everything is fine.

 

One final suggestion. If you haven't uninstalled Norton PC Checkup yet, please do so. The software is scheduled to run weekly and you obviously don't need that to occur. Put this little foray into the world of Norton PC Checkup behind you and go back to enjoying your new PC!

 

Cheers

elsewhere

 

Hi elsewhere,

 

Many thanks for your advice; Norton PC Checkup is about to be demolished.

 

Can now return to the joys of using an updated version of what used to be my favourite MIDI editing program.  This is now so tricky for the uninitiated (moi) that it would probably be simpler to go back to the digital keyboard and re-record the whole piece than to try amending it in the software!

 

All good wishes,

 

Geoff