I've been using Norton Internet Security since it first came out, and used NAV before that. When Norton 360 first came out, I looked over the descriptors and found a lot to be identical. I considered making the switch to 360, but in the end decided to stick with NIS - the old "if it ain't broke down fix it or change anything" kind of thinking. NIS has functioned quite nicely for me since I started using it, and when I did have minor issues with it I was able to resolve them with a little research and self-help. I've had no issues whatsoever with NIS 2009, 2010 or the current 2011.
I know some of the added features differ, but is 360 geared more toward one category of user and NIS toward another? Is there any real advantage to 360 over NIS? I really don't understand the differences.
Regards,
Kelly