Site remediated after compromise, still on Safe Web warning, no re-scan since 10-09-2026

Hello,

Requesting help with a Safe Web listing that appears stuck after remediation.

Our site sentoa.cloud (and subdomains app.sentoa.cloud, api.sentoa.cloud) was flagged on 8 September under “URL:Block [FakeT]”. The cause was a genuine compromise, our WordPress installation on the root domain was hacked and served injected malicious content. We are not disputing that the original detection was warranted.

The site has since been professionally cleaned: the malicious injection and backdoor were removed, the entry point closed, and the WordPress install hardened. Our B2B application and API run on separate Azure infrastructure and were unaffected.

The domain now scans clean on independent services:

  • Google Safe Browsing / Transparency Report: no threats
  • VirusTotal: clean
  • Sucuri SiteCheck: clean

We submitted a re-evaluation through Safe Web already a few times but have had no confirmation and no re-scan since. Meanwhile the warning is blocking legitimate B2B customers from a live production platform.

Two requests:

  1. Could a Norton rep trigger a manual re-scan of the domain and subdomains?
  2. If your scan still detects anything, please tell us the exact URL or resource flagged so we can remediate it, we currently have no visibility into what, if anything, remains.

Thank you.

Hans Breugelmans
Managing Director, Experientive AV bv (owner of sentoa.cloud)

1 Like

Hello @gebruiker61
Welcome to the Norton Community!

Understanding Norton Site Re-Evaluations

We’ll try to call attention:
https://sentoa.cloud/

Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: 23084b0cbedf | af2563324594


b5185a38c4d9/2026-09-18T11:04:15.521Z
1dba5dcebf1d/2026-09-18T11:21:23.417Z

https://app.sentoa.cloud/

Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: app.sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: 9f4c8bc212ef | 492e6141406f


5dfd8ab2b93a/2026-09-18T11:06:48.665Z
c027edafa6c6/2026-09-18T11:22:03.460Z

https://api.sentoa.cloud/

Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: api.sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: ce13f24477c5 | 926bbe035b49


aa7995b452aa/2026-09-18T11:08:20.731Z
6d78167f6f9a/2026-09-18T11:22:44.641Z

2 Likes

sitecheck.sucuri.net - sentoa.cloud

Hi Bjm, thanks for your reply!

Do you think there has already actually been a new scan of our site? We haven’t had any email or notice about a re-evaluation, so we don’t know if anything’s been re-checked since we cleaned it up.

Also, is the Sucuri “unable to scan” something we can fix from our side? If our hosting or a security plugin is blocking the scanner, we’re happy to whitelist it, just let us know what it needs.

And if Norton is still detecting something, could they share the exact URL or a screenshot? We can’t reproduce anything on our side, so we’re a bit in the dark and honestly getting desperate.. the block has forced us to pause all our marketing campaigns…

1 Like

Sorry, I’m not privy to Sucuri processes.

Sorry, I’m not privy to Norton processes.
Hopefully, after the weekend we’ll hear back from F/P submissions.

1 Like

Thanks for your comments bjm, I don’t know if any Norton webmaster also reads the tthreads on this forum but we like to further clarify the Sucuri results. I’m afraid that it’s being read as a detection and it isn’t one.

On the sentoa.cloud report, SiteCheck states “Site is not Blacklisted — 9 blacklists checked”. The “Medium Security Risk” needle is what SiteCheck shows when its scan cannot run, and the reason is printed on the same page: “Unable to scan your site. 426 Upgrade Required” and “Site empty (no content)”. That is a protocol-level failure of their scanner, not a malware finding. We verified from three different clients — HTTP/1.0, HTTP/1.1, and using Sucuri’s own user agent string, that our server returns HTTP 200 with normal content.

More usefully, Sucuri’s scanner completed successfully against the other two hostnames:

  • app.sentoa.cloud — “No Malware Found”, “Site is not Blacklisted” (9 blacklists checked), Low Security Risk
  • api.sentoa.cloud — “No Malware Found”, “Site is not Blacklisted” (9 blacklists checked), Low Security Risk

Independent checks across all three:

  • VirusTotal, 18 September 2026: 0 of 90 engines flag sentoa.cloud
  • Google Safe Browsing, last updated 16 September 2026: “No unsafe content found”
  • Sucuri: not listed on any of the 9 blocklists it checks, for any of the three hostnames

For completeness, and stated plainly: our WordPress site was genuinely compromised on 8 September 2026. A ClickFix/EtherHiding loader was injected into a single theme file and served a fake verification page to desktop visitors. Norton’s original detection was correct and we are not disputing it.

The injected file was removed the same day at 21:33 CEST, roughly seven hours after it appeared. A full scan of 20,251 files on 9 September found no malware, no unknown files, and no modified core, plugin or theme files. The stolen administrator credential was rotated, two-factor authentication enabled, the WordPress file editor disabled, and all plugins and the theme updated.

app.sentoa.cloud and api.sentoa.cloud are a React application and its API, hosted on 9.163.87.240 — a different server from the WordPress site on 188.208.36.198. Neither was ever compromised, and both now scan clean. The flagged file at app.sentoa.cloud/sw.js is an unmodified Workbox-generated service worker and can be inspected directly.

Three false-positive reports were submitted on 8 September 2026. Safe Web still shows the warning and we have seen no re-crawl since 10 September. Could someone please trigger a re-scan of sentoa.cloud, app.sentoa.cloud and api.sentoa.cloud?

The practical impact is that customers running Norton cannot use our product. Because a service worker re-checks for updates on every page load, each affected user receives the alert repeatedly, one reported 19 alerts in a single session.

1 Like

Hello @gebruiker61

Hans, you’ve posted an incredible technical breakdown, and it proves your environment is clean. Please keep in mind: the Norton Safe Web engineering team operates in a closed silo and won’t actually read or debate these points on the forum.

The only thing this forum thread does is help us flag a moderator to manually push your stuck dispute ticket into the engineers’ review queue. Once it’s there, their automated systems and analysts will look strictly at raw telemetry to verify the files are sterile. If your remediation was as thorough as your post indicates, the site will pass their technical check easily once they look at it tomorrow.

AI sourced content may make mistakes

1 Like


https://sentoa.cloud/
Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: 8401edc1a06e
06b8adb38921/2026-09-20T17:13:37.607Z

https://app.sentoa.cloud/
Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: app.sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: d05836a345c4
5bda0bd207eb/2026-09-20T17:17:57.613Z

https://api.sentoa.cloud/
Threat name: URL:Block [FakeT]
URL: api.sentoa.cloud
Detected by: Web Shield | URL scanning
Alert ID: 2fe5080d0112
a2bc32023d9e/2026-09-20T17:19:27.022Z

1 Like

Hi @gebruiker61

Thank You for reporting the issue on Norton Community. The reported url is now resolved as False Positive. Could you please check now?

Thanks !

1 Like

https://sentoa.cloud/



https://app.sentoa.cloud/login


https://api.sentoa.cloud/index.html