Phil_D wrote:
I note with interest that your links to other vendors do not reference their actual EULA's.
Allow me to provide direct links to the EULA's of two vendors you mentioned, McAfee and AVG.
To quote from the McAfee EULA, section 3:
"Upon any termination or expiration of this Agreement, you must cease use of the Software and destroy all copies of the Software and the Documentation."
And to quote from the AVG EULA section 2c:
"On the expiration or termination of this Agreement, you will cease using the Software, AVG Technologies may cease making Updates available to you, and the Software may cease functioning."
Since you seem to have a great interest in the legality of such licensing agreements, I would like to pose a simple question.
If you had purchased a license for either of these products and agreed to the EULA, upon expiration of your license would you abide by the agreement and cease using the software?
[edit: grammar]
Message Edited by Phil_D on 07-29-2009 04:47 PM
Regarding McAfee, I called their support and enquired with them. Their engineer informed me that the software does not cease to be operational upon expiry of a subscription. Now he could be wrong, but the fact remains that McAfee do not aggresively pursue and disable the software themselves upon expiration of the agreement. They do, however, say that you would not get updates.
Regarding AVG, the EULA states that it MAY cease functioning, that's not the same as saying that it WILL cease functioning. Also, the AVG page that I linked to there is a 3-bulletpoint list of what the customers receive during their active license period. None of those 3 items state that during an active license period I receive a right to use the software. It does say so in the EULA, but there is still a discrepancy.
Regarding your question, if the software continues to be functional after the expiration then the only way that I would cease using it is if McAfee and AVG will obtain a court injunction ordering me to do so.
dbrisendine wrote:
I have used all of these packages, along with beta testing them before released to the public. The reason for the choice is not that they are superior to others in protection or stability but a PR move to keep the product in the public eye.
Perhaps so, but such a PR move sets a de facto standard that is difficult to ignore. If a Kaspersky's, ESET's, Sophos's etc revenue suffered as a result of allowing the software to function beyond subscription's expiry then they would not have allowed it. It's simple, they are in business to make money.