• 所有社区 - 中文
    • 所有社区 - 中文
    • 论坛
    • 创意
    • 博客
高级

不是您要找的? 咨询专家!

好评0

Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

http://www.bitdefender.com/VIRUS-1000451-en--Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

That's the report. Now, let's see how long it takes for Symantec to add a definition. 

=\

回复

好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

This is why you use No Script if you using Firefox.
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

What happens when you are actually infected?
=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

How should  I know?  I don't go out purposely flagging down viruses and malware with a sign saying " Hey over here come infected my pc".
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Obviously, by looking at the title, its a trojan; it disguises itself as a legit program. Foolhardy and novice users are generally taken down by trojans.
=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Hi

When starting Firefox the Trojan also starts the Trojan uses JavaScript to identify more than 100 financial intuitions, Banking and money transfer Web sites, including Barclays, Bank of America, PayPal etc. When it recognises a Web site, it will collect logins and passwords, forwarding that information to a server in Russia, giving whoever the ability to access your bank account etc.

Quads 

好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Is that enough for SONAR to flag as malicious? And when will it be added to the defs; its been so long since BitDefender added it =\
=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Bit Defender discovered it on Nov 28th about 3 weeks ago so how is that a long time.
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Thats a huge timeframe. 3 weeks. I thought that Pulse Updates was supposed to close that gap; however obviously Symantec is not being proactive about this threat.
=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

If 3 weeks is a huge time frame in your eyes then you have another thing coming.
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

3 weeks is a LONG TIME.....but lot of thread...have stated that symantec the virus definition dint even get updated to spot certain virus in 1 month..

AND THAT IS because its 1 month as the user came ALL down way down to the forum to seek help and a symantec employee helped out...

WHAT IF he dint come down ? THen it may be 2 - 3 month ? 3 - 4 month ?

he said he sent it like hundreds of time to symantec the file..they just dont upload it.....

AND he have like lots of file undetected by symantec too 

=) techoutsider..so is 1 month longer =D 

yes..infact 3 weeks is also very long..i now have my doubt about norton...

dont know should get it if i buy my new computer
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

3 WEEKS IS NOT ALONG TIME. Come on people. Gezz. And tanmx I thought your Daddy already bought you a new pc that had KAV installed on it.
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Lol I am not going to wait 3+ weeks for this pws stealing trojan to do its work before Symantec finds a fix. If I was a novice, I would never even have heard it. And then all of a sudden the funds in my bank are depleted and someone's been using my credit card =\

You realize that fruad takes over 10 years to clear up and thousands of dollars in the process?

=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Stop being so paranoid. Did you bother to read that it clearly says the spreading is low. If you use Firefox then install No Script. Image if we went from site to site seeing what new trojans,viruses and malware we out there we would never even turn our pc's on. Go ahead and fraud me cause I dont have anything to fraud. One  credit card and its Capitol One which has protection on it. Life is meant to be lived not feared.Message Edited by Dieselman743 on 12-09-2008 05:55 PM
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html


Dieselman743 wrote:
Stop being so paranoid. Did you bother to read that it clearly says the spreading is low.

So you're going to discriminate the unlucky minority that does get burned? 

=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

5 hours. MBAM has added the definition since a user brought attention to it. 

http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=8244

=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Did you bother reading this. I guess not.

This is a quote from the Johnathan Blog the Link to it was provided in initial post, Does This Mean that Firefox is Insecure?

No, and here’s why:

"This particular malware targets our program, but once you have malicious software running on your system, it can just as easily attack other programs, or harm your computer in other ways. '
'This isn’t contracted by just browsing around the web with Firefox 3. In fact, the Malware Protection features in Firefox 3 are designed specifically to prevent sites from being able to attack your computer. "

"The people getting infected here are either downloading enticing files that have the malware hiding inside (which is why Firefox 3 hands off all downloads to your computer’s virus scanner once downloaded) or, as some sites are reporting, people who have already been infected in the past having their computers forced to download this file as well. '

"Typical Firefox 3 users who avoid downloading software they don’t trust are unlikely to ever see this, and even the sites reporting it describe its incidence as “rare”. 

Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

I download malicious files all the time. Norton did not detect anything, until I used the context menu option to scan the file. Just download eicar.zip and see. It might say running virus scan, however it is not going to do anything even if there is malware. I doubt it even scans the file.

As for the threat being "rare", it is still nice for Norton to be on top of those kinds of things. And see my previous posts. 

Message Edited by Tech0utsider on 12-09-2008 10:11 PM
=\
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

The eicar.com test NIS stops in its track. The other tests  NIS lets you download cause NIS doesn't have a web shield. This is why. Web Shields are over rated. Aslong as the virus is detected upon opening that's all that matters. You really need to get your facts straight and understand things a lot more. If you purposely are  downloading malicious files then that's your fault for getting infected and not Symantec's. If your downloading a file via Firefox it will say virus scan running but that doesn't mean NIS is scanning it. That is Firefox scanning it. Its a new feature in version 3. Web Shields also slow down your overall web surfing speed. When I used KAV and Avira my speeds were a lot slower.
Message Edited by Dieselman743 on 12-09-2008 07:17 PMMessage Edited by Dieselman743 on 12-09-2008 07:19 PM
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评1 Stats

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Real-time protection does not scan the contents of container files such a zip files. Manual scan does. If and when a user should choose to extract the file from within the container file it will be caught by the real-time protection.
Reese AnschultzSenior Software Quality Assurance Manager, Symantec Corporation
好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

Thank you Reese for pointing that out which I did already but its nice to see somebody from Symantec back up my statement.
Real Time Protection = NIS 2009 + NATBehavior Analysis = ThreatfireOn Demand = MBAM
好评1 Stats

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

"Real-time protection does not scan the contents of container files such a zip files. Manual scan does. If and when a user should choose to extract the file from within the container file it will be caught by the real-time protection.
  -Reese Anschultz"

All very good but isn't it also rather irrelevant if real-time protection doesn't actually have the definition for the said trojan in the first place?

And three weeks is a VERY LONG time indeed for something as nasty as this. In reality it's no more than a PIA to have your PC trashed by some mangy virus but another thing all together to be left at risk for fraud, only takes one visit to your bank site and your cleaned out.

Most users rely on companies like Symantec to protect them from this type of attack so IMO Symantec should give precedence to these over all others with immeadiate protection.

好评0

Re: Trojan.PWS.ChromeInject.B.html

So if only 1 person on this world gets infected, you are going to ignore that one person's anguish that they were "fruaded"?
=\

This thread is closed from further comment. Please visit the forum to start a new thread.