[Removed] Could there be any confusion as to what this site is about? My 6 year old was searching for Sponge Bob pictures on Google, clicked one link too many, and... Honestly, the algorithm should be able to screen for obvious names like this or variant (masterbate, etcetera.)
As I thought choose Search Settings on the Google home page:
SafeSearch Filtering
Google's SafeSearch blocks web pages containing explicit sexual content from appearing in search results.
Use strict filtering (Filter both explicit text and explicit images) Use moderate filtering (Filter explicit images only - default behavior) Do not filter my search results
Lock SafeSearch This will apply strict filtering to all searches from this computer using Internet Explorer. Learn more
Thanks for the suggestion, but Safe Search was already running. It was set to moderate filtering, which should have "Filter[ed] Explicit Images." The images most certainly were not filtered. Troublesome, no?
[Removed] Could there be any confusion as to what this site is about? My 6 year old was searching for Sponge Bob pictures on Google, clicked one link too many, and... Honestly, the algorithm should be able to screen for obvious names like this or variant (masterbate, etcetera.)
I have now enabled Strict filtering; I am also blocking uncategorized sites via Norton. I know that the Web is just like a street in any town. It's really no different than walking with your kids past an Adult video shop and getting questions. I try to avoid walking past such places. On the web, I guess that I will just have to avoid all the strange towns with strict filtering.
A huge number of legitimate sites are uncatagorized. I had to unblock that range for my son so he could do homework on the Lewis and Clark expedition. Map sites, school projects and lots of things don't even fit the catagories.
The site AngryDad mentions is obviously not trying to hide who they are. Isn't word filtering one of the most basic filter methods? Not to have that in place as an automatic catorgization method seems to be very poor practice.
I could not agree more! This was my point from the beginning. Granted, my son did not type in the offending website name: I confirmed this by retracing his steps. It was a Google image search for Sponge Bob that triggered this. I surmised that a prankster posted a link there or Google erroneously categorized something on the web; regardless, he clicked something on that page and was taken to an adult site. Norton's filter should have read the website name and blocked it!