Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Donec ullamcorper nulla non metus auctor fringilla. Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Cras mattis consectetur purus sit amet fermentum. Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis. Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis.
When Iâve looked at Symantecâs active advertisement of Norton 360, Iâve noticed that thereâs something wrong there: they offer software bundle that combines AntiVirus, Internet Security, SystemWorks and Save&Restore. And thatâs all for relatively small price⌠But recently I decided to upgrade my Norton product line and thought: âWhy not giving it a try?â
Now I must say, this is not BUNDLE, itâs RIPE-OFF! You get some misplaced parts of abovementioned packages mixed together, resulting in very bad experience. Formerly Iâve had fully functional Norton Internet Security, now I get it castrated, plus some more degenerated features belonging to other packages. What do I get?
ďŽ NO in-depth configuration: it just works somehow, you canât control it, except for some very basic options, like ON/OFF switch.
ďŽ NO event logs!!! For me as IT Specialist, this is total insult in my best feelings for Symantec! I canât run my system without firewall and antivirus logs! I feel myself blind and handicapped.
And the most annoying feature is backup system â the part I was aiming for when upgrading. Like all other features, there is NO way to configure it properly. It does blind search for files that it considers âimportantâ. They are mainly pictures and videos, plus some office documents. But it thwors LOTS of junk along, like pictograms and page designs from internet cache, some application skins and other stuff I donât care of. All that junk makes no sense, but still eats LOTS of backup disk space. Other hand, some files that are REALLY important for me are ripped off, most of them being exe files or rare file types. What about my device driver library? I get updated versions often, so I need to back them up incrementally. What about my savegames? What about mods and other stuff for my games? And what about LOTS of other stuff that I REALLY care of?!!1
And yet again, thereâs NO way to easily configure it. I even donât know which files and folders it tries to back up. All you get is report with backup size per file category. But what files and folders does it back up exactly? Yes, there ARE some lists of folders, but you get to dig through all subfolders and subcategories to determine whatâs really included. And yet I feel myself out of control again: I donât know what and how itâs going to back up, but it already eats up about 5 DVDâs. And yes, thereâs no backup compression, I donât ever mention encryption and other security options.
Well, I know that there ARE some users who will like 360 just as it is now. They are basic users who wonât bother configuring firewalls or investigating problems through logs and other stuff⌠But as power user, I find Norton 360 absolutely disappointing. Also I feel misguided by Symantecâs advertisement, as I didnât get stuff that was promised. Now I see whereâs the trick: they promised âautomated scansâ, âautomated backupsâ and other things automated⌠But hey, AUTOMATED doesnât mean UNCONTROLLED! Even full-featured Norton Internet Security has lots of automated functions that require no or minimal user intervention⌠Yet thatâs fully-functional product that I have nothing to say againstâŚ
I think that 360âs ads must clearly state that this product is for basic/home users and not intended for IT professionals and advanced users. This will prevent lots of misunderstanding.
And since this product is really demo version of other products, we âproudâ owners should get discounted prices for all products that it promotes.
I don't believe Symantec is mis-advertising 360 either.
True, it does have all the "faults" you mentioned above. However, it is not meant for professional IT types ... or even above-average computer user. It's meant for the average or below-average computer user who just want an easy-to-use program.
Here's what PC Magazine, a rather techie magazine, had to say about it in their web site review on April 14:
______________
For most PC Magazine readers, a hands-on security suite like Norton Internet Security 2008 is the best fit. But when you go to set up Granny's computer, choose Norton 360 version 2.0 instead. It protects a computer just as NIS 2008 does, and it includes bonus features like a backup facility and a PC tune-up feature. And because it does its work in the background, Granny won't get confused.
_______________
As a 360 beta tester, I can testify that Symantec went to great lengths to accomplish what the review said
BrandonFL wrote:I don't believe Symantec is mis-advertising 360 either.
True, it does have all the "faults" you mentioned above. However, it is not meant for professional IT types ... or even above-average computer user. It's meant for the average or below-average computer user who just want an easy-to-use program.
Here's what PC Magazine, a rather techie magazine, had to say about it in their web site review on April 14:
______________
For most PC Magazine readers, a hands-on security suite like Norton Internet Security 2008 is the best fit. But when you go to set up Granny's computer, choose Norton 360 version 2.0 instead. It protects a computer just as NIS 2008 does, and it includes bonus features like a backup facility and a PC tune-up feature. And because it does its work in the background, Granny won't get confused.
_______________
As a 360 beta tester, I can testify that Symantec went to great lengths to accomplish what the review said
I agree with you -- N360 is fit and forget for people who just want to backup their photos and personal files.
<< But when you go to set up Granny's computer, choose Norton 360 version 2.0 instead. >>
PCMag got a lot of ragging, and worse, about that, apologised to grannies and, I thought, altered the on-line article but I see it's still there on-line so maybe the re-backpedaled.
PC really gone mad -- in all senses <g>
Well, just how it worked for me. I've seen lots of active advertisement for 360 at Norton's site. The first thing I noticed was that this is like bundle pack that prevents from buying 3-4 separate packs. Also I've noticed that there's almost no attention to products like Save&Restore and SystemWorks, which gave me hint that they are being replaced with 360. But I was not interested upgrading my current Norton Internet Security 2008, so I just kept reading the ads. A week ago I've upgraded my entire computer and switched from Windows XP to Windows Vista. And I've decided to upgrade my Norton subscription as well, as I'll have to do that soon anyway. Another reason was that Nero BackItUp was not working correctly under Vista, and I wanted to replace it with Norton solution anyway... So as I already mentioned in the original post, backup was one of my primary aims when upgrading. Then I went to Symantec Store Online and chose Upgrade Center. Along with subscription renewals for NIS2008 I've noticed 360 and thought, 'why not?' Now I'm feeling sorry for that rush decision, but I still think that if Symantec's advertising was a bit more clear and definitive then I'd better stockpiled some more money and purchased Save&Restore and then maybe SystemWorks..
Dan78 I hear what you are saying and agree that N360 is not designed for those more technically minded, it is more for the set and forget style of user. However, I am slightly surprised that you didn't take advantage of the 2 week trial prior to dishing out for something you weren't sure about. I also hear what you are saying in regards to the advertising being a bit misleading for you. Why don't you approach Symantec for a refund or negotiate some sort of switch back to NIS08, NIS09 will be out in a couple of months, a huge improvement over NIS08, and you will be able to upgrade for free.
Thanks for the well written and interesting comments, hopefully Symantec will see your feedback.
Edit: Sent you a PM on here, you should see it up in the top right hand corner of the page.
Hi Dan78,
Thanks for your feedback. It is helpful. I think that you have come to notice both in your usage and through some of the other posts, that Norton 360 is not necessarily the best product for every computer that you own.
When Symantec took a look at security landscape and along with that how do people want to be protected, we found that there is a very large number of computer users who want to interact with their security product as little as possible. Their goals are typically to just open up their computer, know that they are safe, jump on the internet and maybe work on some other apps and do what they need to get done and close it. They don't want fuss and they want to be approached in terms that they understand. They don't want to be intimidated by terms and options that they don't understand. There are many people like this. They want a product that just protects and makes decisions for them. That was our goal and I firmly believe that we have a winning product and many agree!
For more technically saavy persons, such as yourself and perhaps even like me for certain computers, Norton 360 may be a little too automated and friendly to run thorugh what you may want, and Norton Internet Security is a better choice. But at the same time for the people that the referenced article talks about , and I would argue even beyond my parents and grandparents (and I happily note that I have gained back a significant number of hours acting as IT support for my extended family by installing N360) but also certainly to at least some of my computers, that Norton 360 is the best product based upon the usage and user. I find this is the case for the computers, in particular, that I let any guests on and any computers that I'm happy not to have to configure.
We want to make sure that you have the products that make you happy. You should be able to work with Customer Support on this, especially if you are in your first 60 days of use. And by the way, in purchasing any standard license of our subscription security products, you will be entitled to any upgrades for free when they are made available. For example if you buy Norton Internet Security 2008 today will be entitled to a free upgrade to the 2009 version, as long as the subscription is active. Similarly an actively subscribed Norton 360v2 user will be entitled to Norton 360v3 when it arrives.
Thanks for that excellent statement of the background philosophy behind the two.
As others have said perhaps it needs to be stressed a little in Symantec promotion and someone in marketing needs to actually go out and click on all the buttons!
For example if you click on Products in the Welcome menu bar above you get taken to:
http://www.symantec.com/norton/products/index.jsp
And even if you explore a bit it can be downright unhelpful (read "wrong") ...
Go to the Norton 360 page and click on the 10 second Guide to help in selecting a product (you may have to hold down CTRL while you do this) and start the guide.
Check any or all of the boxes and you get N360 as the preferred choice -- OK the choices are biassed to N360 as the product -- but heaven help us if you click on Backup my data -- second choice is Norton Internet Security 2007, not even Save & Restore or Ghost, and not the current version even.
Compare Related Products is straightforward but based on what has been developed in this thread I think you really need to stress the Simple Fit and Forget for N360 and the Fine Tuning for those who need multiple settings for NIS (and NAV?)
Which does raise the question of NIS2009 where the front end seems directed at the N360 market while the Settings pages are for the fine tuners .......
Please don't get upset by my comments -- I spent my working life in hi-tech development and marketing it to industry .... and I'm delighted to be retired! <g>
I've got to say, norton 360 suits my needs perfectly, mainly:
I am a performance user, I play the latest games, I don't want live updates or scans shooting off in the background when I'm doing tasks I want my processor dedicated to 100%
And this is really where norton360 shines for me, before I'd switch off my av, boot it up maybe once a week and do a full system scan on some downtime, but now I'm safe in the knowledge I can use my computer however I want, leave it alone, and norton360 will virus scan where appropriate.
I don't have to think about my security, and I get the full benifit of maximum performance. So for these reasons, I use 360. In my opinion, that's how it was advertised to me aswell.
>>I don't want live updates or scans shooting off in the background..>>
Actually, Live Update will continue to run on schedule, and another thread on here actually asked how to stop this from running and interrupting his games, which was solved.
Glad you like the product, it has really low drag and is very user friendly. Maybe a little more information with regards to threats found and resolved I may have stuck with it, but back to NIS for me, def not NIS08, but NIS09 looks promising.
Sad to hear about it, you may be right about live update, so far I haven't noticed it but might keep a more watchful eye out.
If you're looking to offload some unexpired licences on 360 I might well be interested (unless the mods deem this strictly against the rules).
Just little update. My own solution was to switch back to Norton Internet Security. Now I will save money for Save&Restore and then SystemWorks. Itâs slower and more expensive, but that way Iâll get stuff I will really use in my everyday life, and it wonât make âautomatedâ decisions for me. =)
And yes, I still think that Symantecâs active advertisement of 360 is MISLEADING. It must be stated somewhere that 360 is aimed for basic users, while more âtraditionalâ packages like SystemWorks and Save&Restore will suit needs of more advanced and demanding IT specialists. As I said before, current ads make false impression that 360 will eventually replace packs like SystemWorks and Internet Security. I want this to be clarified. And NO, I donât want 360 to really replace these products. I see 360 as OPTION, not necessarity.
Also I wanted to thank these who defended 360 in this thread. I myself found it useful for these machines that I donât want to waste my time on. Itâs good solution for home multimedia computer: you just set it up one time and then forget about it.
I have to agree with the OP. The original version of the product took at least three windows to temporally turn off "on access scanning" That was fixed in version 2; however, all of the other security products I've ever worked with allow you to do this from the system tray.
Just today I noticed my main f/w complaining about outbound traffic from my Notron360 protected PC. Its random UDP traffic. Probably a real problem. I cannot find anywhere in 360 to see if its f/w is seeing similar traffic.
I choose "comprehensive scan" and it decides I must of meant to run a back up too. Speaking of backups, my backup drive died so I have no backup device, but 360 insist I configure a backup device before "comprehensive scan" will even work.
Honestly, I have no faith in 360 because it does not let you see the details of what its doing.
And should I mention the disk defragmenter looks like its never run based on the "statistics"? But I get the green check.
Hi ayork37. I believe you can disable the backup so that you can run the scan. I do manual backups so I have always disabled the backup option anyway.
I've been using 360 since it came out on my dual boot desktop (32 bit XP and 64 bit Vista), laptop, and family computers. It works great for me. I build my own computers (and sometimes for friends and family) and am no stranger to networking, but for me 360 makes it much quicker to setup while still being protected. Also the smaller footprint that 360 uses versus my old NIS and NSW together makes online gaming faster and I have found that I have to do far less configuring to get my computer and my friends computers to match up.
oh sorry, and to disable youâr backup, you should just be able to click on the backup âsectionâ and there should be an option towards the bottom that says âdisable backupâ, then it will gray out the backup section, and you should be able to run a full scan.
I don't think it can be harvested or eaten, but I know what you mean.
It seems to me that Norton 360 is designed for a certain market and I do not think Symantec has pretended or marketed it otherwise.
I always suggest to people, that if a trial is available, that they trial the software first. Perhaps this is what you should have done, because certainly a trial is available.
Norton 360 does have a firewall - a very good one in my opinion, and there are some logs. Of course you do not say what Norton product you were using before and why you did not stay with the next generation of that product.
The backup is I agree not that good. Its missing lots of features and it is not intuitive. I know because I have made the mistake of saying it has a fundamental flaw, when in fact I merely failed to appreciate how to use it. In fact you can turn off any or all of the pre-selects and simply select which files and folders you want to backup. Accordingly, you can configure it to back up the files you want, but I do not think for example you can set "patterns".
You might be interested to know that you can right click a file or folder in Explorer and add that to the backup set. Having said that you do not even state which version you are using of Norton 360.