Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis. Vestibulum id ligula porta felis euismod semper. Donec ullamcorper nulla non metus auctor fringilla. Aenean lacinia bibendum nulla sed consectetur. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Cras mattis consectetur purus sit amet fermentum. Morbi leo risus, porta ac consectetur ac, vestibulum at eros. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis. Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum. Curabitur blandit tempus porttitor. Sed posuere consectetur est at lobortis.
Did anyone else run across this same or similar situation?
or is it just me?
NY1986 wrote:
I noticed thsi morning like about 10 entries under the Cumminty Watch section of my history. Over the last two days there have been even more, some of which ID Norton files as part of the Bloodhound IM. This morning there ere about 4-5 entries where there were no files noted, yet a bloodhound detection made. Anybody else having this issue? Norton folks, any of this make sense to you?Message Edited by NY1986 on 08-18-2008 09:22 AM
This has already been delt with in another Thread.
There are more people having trouble with it. Symantec is looking into it
Cool. So it might be a bunch of false positives or overzealousness on Norton’s part? I’m cool with that. I rather have a product with too many false positive than a product that doesn’t work.
1 Like