Browsers don't open certain web pages!

Thanks again Allen. The IPs starts with 255 and 132.

 

CMD: IPConfig

 

Microsoft Windows [version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. Tous droits réservés.

Configuration IP de Windows


Carte Ethernet Connexion au réseau local :

   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . : $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
   Adresse IPv6 de liaison locale. . . . .: fe80::2cd6:585b:3d76:c208%18
   Adresse IPv4. . . . . . . . . . . . . .: 132.203.20.146
   Masque de sous-réseau. . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Passerelle par défaut. . . . . . . . . : 132.203.20.1

Carte réseau sans fil Connexion réseau sans fil :

   Statut du média. . . . . . . . . . . . : Média déconnecté
   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . : $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.ca

Carte Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface :

   Statut du média. . . . . . . . . . . . : Média déconnecté
   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . :

Carte Tunnel 6TO4 Adapter :

   Statut du média. . . . . . . . . . . . : Média déconnecté
   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . :

Carte Tunnel Connexion au réseau local* 9 :

   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . : $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.ca
   Adresse IPv6. . . . . . . . . . . . . .: 2002:84cb:1492::84cb:1492
   Passerelle par défaut. . . . . . . . . : 2002:c058:6301::c058:6301

Carte Tunnel Reusable Microsoft 6To4 Adapter :

   Statut du média. . . . . . . . . . . . : Média déconnecté
   Suffixe DNS propre à la connexion. . . :

 

Sorry, Its in French but I think its clear to understand.

 

Yes, At the university and home I (and my friends) have the same problem.

I noticed that My freinds at the university, can open these links, with McAfee.

I tried to run "netsh winsock reset" command in CMD. It works! I can know open all urls. What this command means? What it does? Is it permanently solve my problem? I hope so.

 

 

Nooooooooooooooooooooo, Oh MY GOD! after 3, 4 minutes, it does not open anymore!!!!! Someon give a solution please, please. Am I alone with this pb? For god sake help me.

Hi aryames,

 

Try ipconfig /flushdns in the command prompt. 

 

http://www.techzilo.com/flush-windows-xp-vista-dns-cache/

No success! Thanks anyway SendofJive.

Guys, I fout It. It was Malwarebyte! My dear Norton, I was not kind to You. Sorry.

 

In the log of Windows Internet Connection Reparing, I found that this software dont let the browsers open these urls.

 

Malwarebyte has not an option to exclude an url!!!

 

Thank you guys for your time.

Hello aryames

 

You should be using the free version of Malwarebytes with your Norton product since .the free version will not conflict. The paid version will conflict with Norton..

Hello aryames

Forgive this follow up...

I guess a clue (which I missed) was when you wrote in this message "I have also Malewarebytes, but it does not change anything. with or without that. (I think) I deactivated, but nothing change".

If you have the paid version of MBAM & you disabled MBAM Real Time Protection ...then why would MBAM still block those URL's. 

What am I missing ...Paid version minus Real Time Protection = Free version...& MBAM Real Time blocks URL's ?

If MBAM Real Time blocks those URL's as Threat then surely Norton would flag them also....?

I missed something in this thread ?

Hello bjm_

 

If the O/P had the paid version of Malwarebytes installed first, the O/P may not have got a proper install of  the Norton Product. It's like having another antivirus program installed at the same time. Disabling the other antivirus program isn't good enough since they dig deeply into the system. The same thing with the paid version of Malwarebytes. As you can see in this link, there is more to the paid version of Malwarebytes than just getting the updates automatically. The paid version has a protection mode also in it. I'm sure it digs deep into the computer also. That is why they also have a removal tool to remove malwarebytes. If the paid program didn't dig so deeply into the computer, there would be no need to have a mbam removal tool...

 

http://www.malwarebytes.org/mbam.php

Hi floplot

OK..Makes sense.  Thnx, my head was hurting  ;-)

Never crossed my mind.  MBAM Full Version installed before Norton.

Assumed Norton must have preceded MBAM as we all have Norton primary and MBAM as an adjunct after thought. 

I was aware of MBAM full version Key Features...

I follow your reasoning...just never occured to me to ask OP which came first...lesson learned.

 

Thnx !

Hello bjm_

 

You're welcome.

Hello floplot

So, it does not appear even just a little curious, that a compromised install of Norton (I'll stipulate compromised Norton install) shows up as blocked URL's by MBAM. 

Wonder how long Norton's been compromised...and these two URL's is the only reason OP finds out Norton is compromised.  Beyond my pay grade ....

I can see why OP was plucking away at this...Norton and MBAM were good friends until this falling out. 

Imagine that

Thnx for letting me ramble. 

Just needed to clear some cobwebs.

Cheers

Hello bjm,

 

Yes, the problem was Malwarebytes! Desactivation of that, can not change anything. I uninstalled it. Everything was just well. I am capable to open these urls. I thought that Norton was the reason, no, I was wrong!

 

you know, I dont even know why we can not add urls, like these, to the exclusion list of Malwarebytes! You must uninstall it. I didnt use a removal tool, just uninstall from add-remove.floplot is right, it is in the heart of computer. It always watch what you do and where you go on the internet.

 

Now, because I need another antispyware on my laptop, I install it again, but I didnt activate the protection module of Malwarebytes. I'm looking for another software like Malwarebyte, but I can not decide which one. Do you have any suggestion? Something that make no change to the performance of pc.

 

You know it was 2 years that I had such problem. I was using ESET smart security or Kasersky and finally Norton but ALWAYES WITH Malwarebyte. I always had this problem. It seemed to me that URLs such these have really problem!

 

I thing (my idea), installing Mbam before and after installing Norton, does not change anything. I install always Mbam after security suite.

 

I like to send an email to Malwarebyte. Knowing why their product do like that.

Hi aryames,

 

The free version of MalwareBytes will not cause any problems with NIS. From what I have read in the thread your problem appears to have been caused by having the paid version of MalwareBytes installed when you then installed NIS.

 

This could have caused conflicts which led to this problem. I have never seen any similar issue reported when NIS or any other Norton AV product is run alongside the free version of MalwareBytes.

 

The free version of SuperAntiSpyware is also a good on-demand scanner. As with MalwareBytes make sure you get the free version only.

 

http://www.filehippo.com/download_superantispyware/

 

Best wishes.

Allen

Hi AllenM,

 

Thank you very much for your suggestion. You mean that I have to use an Antispyware with no WebShield, or real time protection or just free versions? I heared that superantiware low down the prformance. What about A2 or Spy Terminator or Emsisoft Anti-Malware? I'm searching now in the internet to choose another one.

Hi aryames

Why are you trying so hard to add another Real Time Anti Spyware product to NAV...see this Norton Product page

NAV has Spyware protection ...

MBAM and SAS are On Demand Scanners and will not conflict with NAV

Anti-malware scanners: On Demand (Not Real Time)

Download the FREE Version for Malwarebytes Anti-Malware

Download the FREE Edition for Superantispyware
Install apps and Update before Scan ....then you can always On-Demand Scan and feel safer.

Ask about any detection before acting on them...an occasional False Positive may sneak in....

 

Two real-time security applications
In general it is never a good idea to have two real-time security applications in use simultaneously.  System performance can be adversely impacted and your protection can actually be lessened, as the two programs can seriously interfere with each other's proper functioning and blocking of malicious things that try to run on your PC.

 

All you need with NAV is a Firewall product...next time you may want to look at Norton Internet Security which has a built in Firewall.

Hi aryames,

 

Spy Terminator appears to include a real-time component so you should not use this. See:

 

http://www.spywareterminator.com/download/download.aspx

 

Emisoft also appears to include real time component:

 

http://www.emsisoft.com/en/

 

I think if you include the free version of MalwareBytes and SuperAntiSpyware as on-demand scannners alongside NIS you should be in good shape.

 

This along with just practicing safe surfing practices and being security cautious over-all.

 

Best wishes.

Allen

bjm and AllenM,

 

Thank You for your comments. Ok, I will use both of them, but free versions.

 

To bjm: I have Norton Internet Security 2010 and I'm happy!

 

Thank You both again.

 

Regards,

Aryames

Hi aryames

My fault...

Lost track of product again...Oooops !

You may not have had a conflict with earlier versions of other Security products ...but, NIS 2010 is so far ahead of the other guys and NIS knows it's the best ... so, your just crowding NIS with another Real Time product.  

Keep your apps patched ...and watch where you click.

      Every Click Matters

 

Hello

 

As I said earlier in the thread, the free version of Malwarebytes will not conflict, but the paid version will.