AllenM
No need to apologise - you've been quoted 'out of context' - those reading should re-read your full post here to clarify.
Tony_Weiss wrote:
I agree with the comments about the Kudos button - that it seems very out of place and doesn't really indicate its purpose. I don't agree that, as AllenM stated, "the Kudos button simply does not work and this problem is so easily solved". The kudos button *does* work (click it and see!) and this problem is hardly easily solved. Not only does it require input from many people behind the scenes, it also requires a balancing of preferences from our key forum contributors (YOU).
That depends on the complexity of your intended solution - Phil_D offered an innovative solution here that proved to be effective for those that used it. Please clarify the official 'Norton" solution that will universally address this issue.
delphinium wrote:
I agree that if Symantec found it important, it would have something done with it by now. It has also been mentioned that the kudos leader board on the forum main page is gone, which if important to Symantec would have been replaced. Perhaps it is an indication that it should not be important to us either.
A year ago, it seems to me that the forum was much more cohesive, friendly, mutually supportive than it is now. We have all seen posters competing like maniacs for kudos. I think it is best not to get caught up in that. Maybe it's time to get back to basics. Heresy, I know, but just my humble opinion. 
The Kudos Leader Board is still there, as per this link.
delphinium wrote:
A year ago, it seems to me that the forum was much more cohesive, friendly, mutually supportive than it is now.
Turbo wrote:
A year ago, it seems to me that the forum was much more cohesive, friendly, mutually supportive than it is now.
I don't think you have to go back that far, it seems to me that the forum is much different now than it was 6 months ago, although I don't understand why. I don't mean different in a good way either, it was much better then than now.
The simmering frustration evident in the recent posts stems directly from Norton's implementation of LiveUpdate. A subject to be discussed in another thread however...